| From |
Message |
Shaukat
Guest
8/26/2004 09:14:25
|
 Subject: The Saudi Dynasty
IP: Logged
Message:
The West and Islam have had a long era of compatibility, but this history has been denied to foster the myth of a "Clash of Civilizations". In order to inflame the sentiments of the West against Islam, our attention has been focused on the specter of fanatical Wahhabism, and more specifically, its most notorious exponent, Ossama bin Laden.
British spy by the name of Hempher was responsible for shaping of the extreme tenets of Wahhabism was mentioned in a Turkish work, Mir'at al-Haramain , by Ayyub Sabri Pasha between 1933-1938. British policy in its colonies often involved the creation of deviant sects, in order to Divide and Conquer, as was the case with the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam in India in the nineteenth century. Here are some extracts and the link to the said book:
During the time when the Ottoman reign was dominant in the Arabian Peninsula, each state was governed by an official selected from the state. Later on, every region except the Hijaz came into the possession of whomever could usurp it and was governed as sheikhdoms.
The tenets of Wahhabism disseminated by Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab changed into a political form in a short time in 1150 A.H. (1737) and spread all over Arabia. Later, by the order of the Caliph in Istanbul, Muhammad 'Ali Pasha, the Governor of Egypt, liberated Arabia from them with the armed forces of Egypt.
'Abd al-'Aziz ibn Muhammad, who believed in the Wahhabis, declared war for the first time in 1205 A.H. (1791) against the amir of Mecca, Sharif Ghalib Effendi. They had disseminated Wahhabism secretly till then. They had killed and tortured many Muslims, enslaved their women and children and usurped their possessions.
Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab belonged to the Bani Tamim tribe. He was born in Uyayna village near the town of Huraimila in the Najd Desert in 1111 A.H. (1699) and died in 1206 (1792). Formerly, with the idea of trading, he went to Basra, Baghdad, Iran, India and Damascus, where he won the name "Shaikh an-Najdi" due to his clever and aggressive attitude. He saw and learnt a great deal at these places and set his heart on the idea of becoming a chief. In 1125 (1713 A.D.), he met Hempher, a British spy, in Basra, who understood that this unexperienced young person (ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab) has a desire to be a chief by way of revolution, established a long-term friendship with him. He inspired him the trics and lies that he had learned from the British Ministry of the Commonwealth. Seeing that Muhammad enjoys these inspirations, he proposed him to establish a new religion. So, the spy and Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab got what they were looking for. He had thought it proper to found a new Tariqa or reach his goal, and, in preparation for this goal, attended the lectures of the Hanbali 'ulama' in the blessed city of Medina and later in Damascus for some time. When he went back to the Najd, he wrote pamphlets on religious subjects for villagers. He wrote what he learned from the British spy and mixed corrupt information from the Mutazila and other groups of bidat. Many ignorant villagers, particularly the inhabitants of Dar'iyya and their ignorant chief, Muhammad ibn Sa'ud, followed him. The Arabs esteemed ancestral distinctions very highly, and because he did not belong to a well-known family, he used Muhammad ibn Sa'ud as a tool to disseminate his Tariqa, which he named Wahhabism. He introduced himself as the Qadi (Head of the Religious Affairs) and Muhammad ibn Sa'ud as the Hakim (Ruler). He had it passed in their constitution that both would be succeeded only by their children.
In 1306 (1888) when the book Mirat al-Haramain was written, the amir of the Najd was 'Abdullah ibn Faysal, a descendant of Muhammad ibn Sa'ud, and the Qadi was a descendant of Muhammad ibn 'abd al-Wahhab.
Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab's father, 'Abd al-Wahhab, who was a pious, pure alim in Medina , his brother Sulaiman ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab and his teachers had apprehended from his statements, behavior and ideas, which he frequently had put forward as questions to them when he was a student in Medina, that he would become a heretic who would harm Islam from the inside in the future. They advised him to correct his ideas and advised the Muslims to avoid him. But they soon encountered the very thing they were afraid of, and he started disseminating his heretical ideas openly under the name of Wahhabism. To deceive ignorant and stupid people, he came forward with reforms and innovations incompatible with the books of the 'ulama' of Islam. He dared to be so impetuous as to deem the true Muslims of Ahl as-Sunnat wal-Jamaat as disbelievers. He regarded it as polytheism to ask Allahu ta'ala for something through the mediation of our Prophet (sall-Allahu 'alaihi wa sallam) or other prophets or awliya', or to visit their graves.
According to what Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab learned from the British spy, he who talks to the dead while praying near a grave becomes a polytheist. He asserted that Muslims who said that someone or something beside Allah did something, for example, saying "such-and-such medicine cured" or "I obtained what I asked through our master Rasulullah" or "such-and-such wali" were polytheists. Although the documents Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab made up to support such statements were nothing but lies and slanders, the ignorant people who could not distinguish right from wrong, the unemployed, raiders, ignoramuses, opportunists and the hard-hearted soon assented to his ideas and took their part on his side and regarded the pious Muslims of the right path as disbelievers.
When Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab applied to the rulers of Dar'iyya with the view of disseminating his heresies easily through them, they willingly cooperated with him with the hope of extending their territories and increasing their power. They strove with all their might do disseminate his ideas everywhere. They declared war against those who refused and opposed them. The bestial people and pillagers of the desert competed with one another in joining the army of Muhammad ibn Sa'ud when it was said that it was halal to plunder and kill Muslims. In 1143 (1730), Muhammad ibn Sa'ud and Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab hand in hand arrived at the conclusion that those who would not accept Wahhabism were disbelievers and polytheists, and that it was halal to kill them and confiscate their possessions, and publicly announced their declaration seven years later. Then, Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab started fabricating ijtihad when he was thirty-two years old and announced his false ijtihads at the age of forty.
As-Sayyid Ahmad ibn Zaini Dahlan (rahmat-Allahi 'alaihi), Mufti of the blessed city of Mecca, described under the topic "Al-fitnat al-Wahhabiyya" the tenets of Wahhabism and the tortures the Wahhabis inflicted upon Muslims? [Al-futuhat al-Islamiyya, second volume, page 228, Cairo, 1387 (1968); photo-offset reproduction of a comparable part, Istanbul, 1395 (1975).] He wrote: "To deceive the 'ulama' of Ahl as-Sunnat in Mecca and Medina , they sent their men to these cities, but these men could not answer the questions of the Muslim 'ulama'. It became evident that they were ignorant heretics. A verdict declaring them disbelievers was written and distributed everywhere. Sharif Masud ibn Said, Amir of Mecca, ordered that the Wahhabis should be imprisoned. Some Wahhabis fled to Dar'iyya and recounted what had happened to them." [Al-futuhat al-Islamiyya, second volume, page 234, Cairo, 1387 (1968); photo-offset reproduction of a comparable part, Istanbul, 1395 (1975).]
The 'ulama' of the Hijaz belonging to all the four madhhabs, including Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab's brother Sulaiman and also his teachers who had trained him, studied Muhammad's books, prepared answers to his disunionist writings, which were destructive to Islam, and wrote, to call to the attention of Muslims, well-documented books in refutation to his heretical writings. [See above article 5, for the passage translated from Sulaiman ibn Abd al-Wahhab's work As-Sawa'iq al-ilahiyya fi'r-raddi ala'l-wahhabiyya; first published in 1306; second edition (reproduced by photo-offset) in Istanbul in 1395 (1975).]
These books did not help much but rather increased the Wahhabis' resentment against Muslims and excited Muhammad ibn Sa'ud to attack Muslims and augment the bloodshed. He belonged to the Bani Hanifa tribe, so was a descendant of a stupid race that believed in the prophethood of Musailamat al-Kadhdhab. Muhammad ibn Sa'ud died in 1178 (1765), and his son 'Abd al-'Aziz succeeded him. 'Abd al-'Aziz was assassinated, stabbed in the abdomen by a Shiite, in the Dar'iyya Mosque in 1217 (1830). Then, his son Sa'ud ibn 'Abd al-'Aziz became the chief of the Wahhabis. All three strove very hard, as if competing with one another, to shed Muslim blood in order to deceive the Arabs and to disseminate Wahhabism.
The Wahhabis say that Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab disseminated his thoughts in order to attain sincerity in his belief in"Sharif Ghalib fled from fear! And the Ta'ifians do not have the power to resist you! They sent me to communicate that they will surrender the fortress, and they ask you to forgive them. I like the Wahhabis. Come back! You have shed much blood! It is not right to go back without capturing Ta'if. I swear that the Ta'ifians will immediately surrender the fortress. They will accept whatever you want." It was Sharif Ghalib Effendi's fault that Ta'if was lost in vain. If he had stayed in Ta'if, Muslims would not have suffered that doom. Since "Traitors are cowards," the Wahhabis did not believe that the Ta'ifians would surrender readily. But, seeing the flag of truce on the fortress, they sent an envoy to the fortress to investigate the situation. The Ta'ifians, pulled the envoy up to the fortress with a rope. "Gather all your goods here and surrender if you want to save your lives," said the envoy. All their possessions were gathered with the effort of a Muslim named Ibrahim. "This is not enough!" said the envoy, "We cannot forgive you for this much. You should bring more!" He gave them a notebook and said, "List the names of those who do not give! The men are free to go wherever they wish. The women and children will be put in chains." Although they begged him to be a little bit softer, he increased his aggression and harshness. Ibrahim, unable to be patient any more, hit him on the chest with a stone and killed him. During this confusion, the Wahhabis attacked the fortress, thus they escaped from being hit by cannon balls and bullets. They broke the gates and entered the fortress. They killed every woman, man and child they saw, cutting even the babies in cradles. The streets turned into floods of blood. They raided the houses and plundered everywhere, attacking outrageously and madly till sunset. They could not capture the stone houses in the eastern part of the fortress, so they besieged and put those houses under a shower of bullets. a Wahhabite scoundrel shouted: "We forgive you! You may go wherever you want with your wives and children," but they did not yield. Meanwhile, the Wahhabis gathered the people, who had set out to migrate, on a hill and encircled those pure Muslim families, who had grown up amid fondling and affection and most of whom were women and children, and held them to die of hunger and thirst for twelve days, and tortured them by slandering, stoning and cudgeling. The Wahhabis called them one by one and beat them and said, "Tell us where you hid your possessions!" and howled, "Your day of death is coming!" to those who begged for mercy………
http://www.davidicke.net/emagazine/vol15/articles/saudi2.html
 
|
Anonymous
Guest
8/26/2004 11:19:39
| RE: The Saudi Dynasty
IP: Logged
Message:
After the WW II, the Western colonialists left their Muslim colonies – physically, but made sure that Muslims never be united to challenge Western domination of the world. To achieve their agenda, they created four ‘finas’ in the Muslim world and fed each of them into the ‘third stage cancer’. These ‘fitnas’ ad their job are:
1.Bahaism – To make Islam a ‘Jewish compliant’ religion. Their headquater is in Hiafa, Israel.
2.Kemalism – To make sure that Muslim Ummah never get united under one Khalifah.
3.Qadianism – To kill the spirit of ‘military struggle (Jihad)’ from the tenants of Islam, and eventually destruction of the only Muslim country created on the basis of Islam – Pakistan.
4.Saudi dynasty – To corrupt and destroy every resistance against the Western and Jewish colonialism – by dividing the Muslims by flaring the flames of sectarianism. Being the rulers of the two most sacred cities of Muslims – who else could do a better job than Wahabi Saudis.
However, the interesting part is that the 'founders' of all these cults were offsprings of Jews!
|
Anonymous
Guest
8/27/2004 04:20:17
| RE: The Saudi Dynasty
IP: Logged
Message:
Brother, I agree with you, but I have some questions.
First let me clarify that I abhor Saudi’s animosity against main stream Sunah and Sufisim, they are heretics, but they are famous for that beside they don’t claim to rule any Islamic Republic, (true they claim to be KHADIM AL HARAMIN, & almost every Muslim knows it is untrue). Only Iran Claims that name (Islamic Republic), I used to be quite fond of the Islamic Revolution of 1979, and I admired and loved Immam Khumeni,....... then it started to change, first I discovered their friendship with Syria. I often wondered about the unwavering Iranian love-support relation with one of the worst Killer of Muslims in ME (after Pisrael) assad of Syria, so I said to my self “no body is perfect”, then the Chechen war started and I read Iranian leaders declarations that Chechnya is an internal part & problem of Russia, and seeing them on the media, how they paid homage hugging drunkards-marauds-Russian-leaders in Moscow, I searched a bit more and getting disappointed again and again, and I became very sad and annoyed when I read some of the books their Allama and found out how much they hate Syduna Abubaker (Alieh Al Salam), his Daughter Syudatina Aysha Aliha AlSalam) and Uthman Iben Afan (Alihi Al Salam) and other Sahabas, Shii’a claim to love and obey Ahlu Al Beit then why slandering them. WHY?
Is it true that there is not even one Islamic-Sunah Mosque in all Tehran?.
PLEASE I AM ONLY SEEKING THE TRUTH, I still love Iran and their people, it is the only country where you can practice Islam with out any fear (can you do that if you are a Sunni?)
|
Siegebreaker
Guest
8/27/2004 07:49:57
| RE: The Saudi Dynasty
IP: Logged
Message:
The Siegebreaker is here.
The Arabs' Bane.
I'm watching you.
|
Shaukat
Guest
8/27/2004 09:44:12
| RE: The Saudi Dynasty
IP: Logged
Message:
Salaam.
Let me first make something very straight – I am not a Shi’ite, nor a Sunni, Salafi, Wahabi or Qadiani. Frankly I hate every ‘Sectarian’. I wish to live an die as ‘just Muslim’.
Now let me try to your comments and question:
Saudi ‘royal’ are not afraid of any ‘Muslim sect’ – They are afraid of Islamic political thought – Which poses threat both to them and their Western bosses.
Saudi ‘royals’ did not coin the KHADIM AL HARAMIN. The title was ‘bestowed’ on them by the British.
The Islamic Revolution lead by Imam Khomeini (ra) was not the culmination of the struggle for the creation of an Islamic State, but the beginning (1979) of it, which is still going on against the local Munafiqun and the foreign Kufar and their Muslim sectarian and secularist agents. Personally, Iran is an ‘Islamic State’ as compared to the rest of the odd 56 Muslim nation-states, but not a true Islamic entity – as yet.
Imam Khomeini (ra), was a Muslim reformer and a freedom-fighter – not just a Shi’ite. He was totally against any kind of sectarianism. When the Arab media called the 1979 Revolution as ‘Shia Revolution’, the Imam was the first to rebuke them by saying that it is an ‘Islamic and not Shi’ite’ revolution’. That’s why he is still revered not only by the ‘open-minded’ Muslims of all thoughts, but even by non-Muslim revolutionaries like Cuban Fidel Castro. Regarding Imam’s open-mindedness, one can see how on the first anniversary of Islamic Revolution, he prayed Juma’a prayer in Qum, behind a Sunni Kurd Mullah.
Tehran’s friendships with Syria or Russia are not a ‘hate–love’ situation based on religion – it is a defensive strategy. Syria’s ‘royals’ may confess to be Alawi (a branch of Shi’ite), but the present Iranian Rehbar, Ayatullah Khamenie called them ‘Shias without Shri’ah’. The Imam did declare that ‘We will export Islamic Revolution to other Muslim lands’, but I don’t think he meant at the risk of its base in Iran. That in thought, you can see why Tehran stayed with the rest of the Muslim nation-states ‘considering’ Chechnya as Russian internal conflict. Russians are the only one in the whole world who are helping Tehran to defend itself against both the US and Israel – with a price-tag of course.
Now coming to the ‘Mufti stuff’ – Both Sunnis and Shi’ites who think that the Companions and 12-Imams are ‘infallible (sinless or above criticism)’ are wrong in my opinion. The only person who hold that position is ALLAH and His Last Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). And don’t forget that some of the ‘Sahabas’ you mentioned – were involved killing other ‘sahabas’ – Muawyia and Syedina Aisha (as) included.
‘Is it true that there is not even one Islamic-Sunah Mosque in all Tehran?’
Frankly, I don’t know and I don’t give it a damn. I have prayed in Toronto’s Jafferyia Mosque many times with the Shi’ite kicking me out – While several of my Shi’ite friends have prayed behind Imam Asi and Zafar Bangesh (both Sunnis) on many ocassion. Remember, a Mosque is ‘house of Allah’ – it is neither Sunni or Shi’ite. People should learn Ummah’s unity from Hajj – Where Sunnis and Shi’ites both go to the same ‘house of Allah’ – the Ka’aba’.
NO FATWA PLEASE.
|
Anonymous
Guest
8/27/2004 15:50:52
| RE: The Saudi Dynasty
IP: Logged
Message:
Brother Shaukat;
Jazakum Allahu Khayran, may Allah (SWT) unite all Muslims,
AMEEEEEN
|
ALBOZCHILL
Guest
8/28/2004 13:57:41
| RE: The Saudi Dynasty
IP: Logged
Message:
AS SALAAM ALAYKOM
BROTHER Shaukaut im ignorant in the wahhabism subject but i thought that he was sent to purify Islam i mean why would he betray Islam ? im not loooking for a debate i just wanna know why some people say he was in a way a savior to Islam and your article says he wasnt ? if you can pleaseeee explain it sorry to bother you brother also i would also like to point out sufis are in a way innovaters
|
Shaukat
Guest
8/28/2004 15:09:37
| RE: The Saudi Dynasty
IP: Logged
Message:
Why do I have the guts-feelings that you are not interested in ‘knowing the answer’, but doing your job as a hacker’? But the benefit of Muslims, I would like to clarify some points on the so-called Wahbism. The Saudi family are not the true followers of Sheikh Wahab, but using his name to fool honest Muslims.
First of all – I don’t believe ‘he was sent to purify Islam’. Now ‘who’ would have sent him? Jews or Allah? But the truth is Sheikh Muhammad Wahab was a Muslim scholar and considered to be a ‘Reformer’ by some of his followers.
Now where in my ‘article you read he was not’? I was talking about Saudi ‘royals’ and not the Sheikh. You sound like the Zionists consider every criticism of Israel as ‘anti-Zionism’ – While 90% of Jews occupying Muslim Palestine are not ‘Semite’ but criminal Khazars.
If you feel ‘Sufis are in way innovators’ – good for you, but I have no intention of joining your ‘anti-Semitism’!
|
Anonymous
Guest
8/28/2004 22:23:14
| RE: The Saudi Dynasty
IP: Logged
Message:
Siegebreaker
is in-breed yahudi kalb
|
Anonymous
Guest
8/29/2004 11:21:53
| RE: The Saudi Dynasty
IP: Logged
Message:
Hi Albazoo,
It's nice to see a 'Jew snake' shedding-off its skin every next post.
|
ALBOZCHILL
Guest
8/29/2004 11:36:13
| RE: The Saudi Dynasty
IP: Logged
Message:
im not a jew i was just asking a question relax shaukut thanks for answering my question
|
Anonymous
Guest
8/29/2004 12:20:15
| RE: The Saudi Dynasty
IP: Logged
Message:
Hi Albazoo,
And believe me, I am certainly not John Paul II. It just happen that like to expose those filthy Zionist Jews who are swarming over every second Muslim website - pretending to be Muslims.
So, as the saying goes: "If the shoe fits, wear it."
|
|
|
